What’s the evidence for programs that reduce long-term foster care?
Building evidence for programs that reduce long-term foster care
Evaluations to improve child welfare practice, ensuring that children are in safe, stable, and permanent homes.
The Permanency Innovations Initiative (PII), a Presidential initiative, has funded 6 grantees to test innovative strategies to improve the outcomes for foster children who face the most serious barriers to permanence.
Westat, for the Administration for Children and Families, is leading a team that is designing and conducting rigorous evaluations to test their effectiveness.
Westat has helped the grantees identify the subpopulations at risk of long-term foster care in their systems, understand the evidence for their selected interventions, and develop comprehensive evaluation plans.
We collected primary and administrative data on outcomes for treatment and comparison groups.
We have worked closely with the grantees to conduct thoughtful formative evaluations and to encourage use of randomized controlled trials and other rigorous evaluation methodologies.
The work also includes an implementation evaluation, a cost study, an impact evaluation, and dissemination.
Evaluating the success of these innovations and of the overall PII approach enhances the knowledge base that guides child welfare practice.
Expert InterviewCircles of Reflection Toolkit: Improving Education for Native Students
For decades, Native students have faced significant opportunity gaps that impede their academic achievement and trajectories. To close these gaps, the Native Education Collaborative, supported…
PerspectiveAlcohol and Pregnancy: Ways Health Providers Can Better Intervene
Fetal alcohol spectrum disorders (FASDs) is an umbrella term describing the range of lifelong physical, behavioral, and intellectual disabilities that can occur in an individual…
Expert InterviewHow Can We Bridge Gaps in Public Health Knowledge?
In this age of media saturation and polarization, wrong information can flourish with a detrimental impact on public health. To learn why people believe unverified…