This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
How do PCORI programs promote stakeholder engagement?
Analyzing PCORI’s Engagement Award Program
Challenge
PCORI’s Eugene Washington Engagement Award Program (EAP) funds engagement projects that aim to bring patient and stakeholder perspectives into the development, research, and dissemination of patient-centered comparative effectiveness research. To further institutional knowledge, provide a roadmap to monitor progress and measure success, and develop actionable approaches to reinforce organizational change and engage stakeholders in patient-centered outcomes research, PCORI is developing a learning agenda and learning plan for the EAP.
Solution
Westat is assisting PCORI in developing this learning agenda and learning plan by assessing the current EAP portfolio, developing a learning agenda and learning plan in collaboration with PCORI leadership, and sharing findings with PCORI staff and stakeholders. This work will:
- Assist with internal program planning
- Support the integration of tools, resources, and lessons learned from EAP awardees with other PCORI programs and projects
- Plan future learning and evaluation activities
- Communicate the accomplishments of the program and awarded projects
This project will use qualitative and quantitative data collection efforts to describe the current portfolio and evaluate outcomes of EAP awards to date, including a document review, focus groups, interviews and a survey.
Results
The Learning and Engagement Award Portfolio analysis and the development of the learning plan and learning agenda will inform PCORI’s next steps on how to create specific funding opportunities that address gaps in the current EAP portfolio and make suggestions as to how PCORI can better support their awardees and the communities they engage. This work will build capacity in the larger community of researchers who conduct patient-centered comparative effectiveness research and the communities they engage.
Focus Areas
Health Services Research and Health PolicyCapabilities
Evaluation and Mixed-Methods Research Innovative Data Collection and Management Tools Technical AssistanceSenior Expert Contact
Meg Tucker
Principal Research Associate
-
Expert Interview
Why Are People Reluctant to Share Health App Data?May 2025
In an age where smart watches track our heart rate, apps detect our sleep patterns, and digital platforms monitor the calories we burn, the potential…
-
Expert Interview
Fine-Tuning LLMs to Improve Adverse Drug Event Detection and ReportingApril 2025
The expedient, accurate detection of the severity of adverse drug events (ADEs) remains a serious challenge. Despite technological advancements, data-driven models often fail to precisely…
-
Perspective
Leveraging Quantum Computing to Accelerate Biomedical InnovationsMarch 2025
Quantum computing is poised to revolutionize health care and biomedical research, making a tangible impact on Americans’ everyday lives. By rapidly analyzing vast genetic and…