This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognizing you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.
Does a 2nd review of school meal applications reduce errors?
Performing an independent review of school meal applications
Challenge
Every year, local education agencies (LEAs) review the information provided by households on school meal applications and determine whether the students in the household are eligible to receive free, reduced-price, or paid school meals.
The Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (HHFKA) added a provision that requires certain LEAs to conduct a 2nd, independent review of applications (IRA) of those school meal applications to verify that the correct determination has been reached.
The IRA process was first implemented in school year 2014-15. Data from the first 2 years that the IRA process was in place showed that few errors were caught during the 2nd review, which was unexpected.
For the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA’s) Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), Westat conducted the Independent Review of Applications (IRA) Study to understand the IRA process and whether it is effective at identifying and correcting errors.
Solution
The study included both a process and an outcomes assessment.
The process assessment examined how all state agencies and 30 LEAs implement the IRA requirement. The outcomes assessment involved collecting household application data and assessing eligibility for each application, and then comparing the study team’s eligibility determinations to the LEAs’ determinations.
Taken together, the process and outcomes assessments describe the IRA process, provide insight into the types and causes of errors, and offer recommendations to improve the process.
The study also involved multimode data collection, including an online survey, telephone interviews, and abstraction of households’ paper and electronic applications for school meals.
Results
LEAs usually classify student eligibility for school meals correctly; less than 5% of applications were classified in error.
LEAs report that the 2 biggest challenges with the IRA process are:
- Receiving incomplete/illegible applications from households
- Having available staff to conduct a 2nd review of applications
States perceive that LEAs of all sizes struggle to complete the IRA process within the required 10-day timeframe.
See the FNS website for the full report: Evaluation of the Independent Review of Applications in USDA Child Nutrition Programs.
-
Issue Brief
Young Children’s Consumption of 100% Fruit Juice by Racial-Ethnic Characteristics of Their MothersMarch 2023
Congress authorized the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) as a pilot program in 1972 and made WIC permanent in 1974.…
-
Perspective
CDISC Conformance and Compliance: So Many Resources, So Little Time!February 2023
Implementing the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) standards required for data management, programming, documentation, and eCTD data submission can be challenging for many reasons…
-
Expert Interview
How Will the Marine Corps Integrate Men and Women at Recruit Training?January 2023
Marine Corps recruit training is every bit as intense as it looks. Each morning starts hours before sunrise with a chorus of screaming drill instructors…